What a thought-stirker! Here's my two cents, but I'm keen to hear what others think.

In the evolution camp, ESG has been shaping up, slowly but surely. It's like a tree's growth – the daily changes are imperceptible, but over time, there's a clear transformation. Companies are progressively embedding sustainability into their operations, layer by layer. But is this gradual pace enough?

Then, consider the revolution angle. Sometimes, change demands a jolt, a foundational shake-up. Given the distress signals our planet is sending, could a swift, radical shift in ESG practices be the answer? It's as if we're rolling the ESG dice, hoping for a game-changing outcome.

However, let's not overlook the harsh realities underpinning some of our industries. Take, for instance, the mining of resources for mobile phones. The conditions there are often dire, with laborers, including children, working in hazardous environments.

We're all part of this system, directly or indirectly, by using these devices. Shouldn't this be a catalyst for change? Perhaps stricter regulations are needed for the big players pulling the strings in these industries.

This aspect pushes us to ponder: Do we need a blend of evolution and revolution in ESG, or is it time for a more aggressive, transformative approach?

So, what are your thoughts? Are we on a path of slow and steady evolution, or is it time for a ground-shaking revolution, especially in light of these urgent social justice issues?

I'm curious to hear different viewpoints!